Funny how one claims that one knows me and said things that clearly shows how little knowledge one knows of me. “I know you Muaz” – correction, you do NOT know me, it’s obvious from the things that you said that you do not know me, you probably only know OF me; an “idea” of me that you have in your head and perceive as the true me. Never claim you know a person if you really don’t just so that you think you could get your points across.
It’s like a typical thing here; you know when people say “ah kawanku tu”; kawan? Friends? A classmate of 3 years who I never spoke to and I never really know... I wouldn’t call him/her a friend, but an acquaintance rather.
So you’re probably studying in the same place that I am, seen me a couple of times, heard of me or whatever – none of which could serve as “knowing” me. And if you REALLY do know me, why bother disguising yourself as “guest”? Some of my own real friends disagree with me every now and then – because hey that’s life – not everyone agrees with you. If you REALLY know me, you would’ve revealed who you are.
And now wow, using my social network against me? Probably using that to humiliate me? To be honest, I’m not embarrassed with the fact that I have more girls than guys in my group of friends. Funny that in this era, some still think highly negative of people with different genders hanging out as friends. Hanging out with more girls than guys does not make me a girl, but rather it makes me more of a man. Why? It helps me understand women (their feelings, their perceptions, their expectations from men) – a trait that I doubt I will acquire if I ONLY hang out with guys. And really, if you really DO know me; you would have known that I do have male friends. I was brought up surrounded by girls; it is inevitable that I click with them very well. And really, what does my social networking has anything to do with the things that I say?
************
Hah. It just got to me now. I’m reading this book called “A New Earth: awakening to your life’s purpose” by Eckhart Tolle. The book talks about the concept of “Pain-bodies” in humans. It’s a somewhat complicated concept but I shall sum it up by defining it as “a negative ego-driven emotion that stays in a person from a particular or a series of events”. The pain-body as per its name suggest, seeks pain, it’s not part of that person but it lives within the person. Many live their life controlled by their pain-bodies and not realising that their true self is thus “unconscious”. It takes a person to be fully conscious to understand that the “thing” that controls them is not them.
So anyway... why am I talking about this? The pain-body seeks pain - - from others. It feeds on the negative energy that it creates. It normally waits for a particular event that could trigger a fight and then all hell broke loose. Blog haters (in general) for example, they read someone’s blog regardless of the fact that the blog contains ideas that completely oppose that of their own; the pain-body of the hater collects this energy (negative energy created for reading things that he/she disproves of) and waits for a particular event; maybe a particular post, to finally declare war. That is when the hater leaves hatred comments – at this stage, comments are normally directed to the post.
Interestingly enough, albeit weirdly, the hater would normally wait for the author of the blog to respond to his/her negative comment, they would come to visit just to see if the author has anything to say. And the author finally spoke, clarifying his/her post maybe – in a rather civil manner.
This ticks off the hater’s pain-body even more, it doesn’t want peace, it wants war – not until the author gets upset or probably break down or probably even shuts down his/her blog – will the hater’s pain-body be satisfied. At this point, allegations will arise. It knows that criticisms on the post is not enough to put the author down, it will then stray away from the whole point of the “fight” to something entirely out of context – maybe something personal, if it doesn’t know anything about the author, it will then create allegations that they perceive to be true. Like in my case here... my social networking... and then me using thesaurus? Really, what do those have anything to do with anything?
You can see a lot of these kinds of things in fights – relationship fights mostly – it always tends to stray away from the root of the problem, past mistakes are always brought up just to heat up the argument.
Is it weird for me to see this whole thing as fascinating? It’s a great real life example for my reading. Hehe.
I said it before and I’m going to say it again; really if you don’t like reading what you read here... why exactly are you still here? There are a lot of blogs out there that I disagree with, quite a number of them are even my own friends’ blogs; but you know what I do? I don’t leave hate comments – I just don’t bother reading them. It’s that easy.
“A New Earth: Awakening to your life’s purpose” by Eckhart Tolle – it’s a good book, costs about 21 bucks over at Best Eastern.
p/s - I don't use thesauruses, not my fault if you don't get my intertexuality or my choice of vocabs.
With love,
Muaz Al Rashid